Published in the July/August 2007 issue
Interview: Colin Clark
Somerfield’s security boss likes to keep infosecurity
simple. He tells Eleanor Dallaway why he prefers to keep emails
rather than block them, why Chip and PIN is a con and what is wrong
with loyalty cards

“I could chat to you about security all day, but I do resent
going more than an hour and a half without a cigarette.” Meet
Colin Clark, head of corporate business control for Somerfield,
a UK-wide chain of 850 small supermarkets. A man who can talk about
security as if it’s second nature, and who maintains that
despite having worked in security for many years, has dodged the
wave of cynicism that washes over so many infosecurity professionals.
“In this job, it’s pretty easy to get negative,”
he says. “But you just have to realise that not everyone is
a crook. The vast majority of people are honest and very good at
their job and it’s my prerogative to make sure that their
job is as easy as possible for them – to make security a built-in
by-product of their role.”
Colin Clark has been with Somerfield on and off for 27 years,
and in this particular role for just short of a decade. He lists
quickly his daily responsibilities, unfazed by the apparent magnitude
of his role: “Risk assessment, business continuity planning
and disaster recovery, systems control, archiving information retention,
de-risking new products and traditional internal audit.”
“I’m involved with criminal investigations too. There
are a huge amount of security issues when running a supermarket,
anything from fraud and theft to nuisance children and the drunks
who come in and urinate in our chiller cabinets. You’d be
amazed what happens in our stores.”
“Last year when we were taken private and de-listed [from
the stock market], I was moved over to take over the audit department.
Our department is the ‘conscience of the business’ –
we’re whiter than white.”
But with an increasing number of insider threat incidents reported,
how can Clark be sure that his staff are whiter than white? “The
trick is, don’t allow staff access to data that they shouldn’t
be able to see. Don’t put it in within their reach and then
watch over them to make sure they don’t look at it, just don’t
give them access in the first place. There you go – you’ve
got compliance.”
“Compliance is not about making people do things –
it’s about putting in a structure in the first place. If you
make it easy for people to go wrong, then they will. So don’t
give them that opportunity.”
The stupid insider threat
Although staff can be a company’s greatest asset, they are
also the biggest threat. “The insider threat isn’t usually
malicious, it’s just stupidity. Recently we thought a member
of staff had accidentally added a supplier to an email group which
we’d been using to broadcast the immediate forecasts for next
year. That’s how easily stupid mistakes can happen.”
However, with 1-2% of turnover sacrificed to stock loss, 80% of
which is due to staff theft, it is apparent just how much damage
can be done from the inside, he adds.
Many organisations are now offering staff training programs to
educate employees about information security. “Somerfield
introduces new staff to the policies and rules on their induction,”
says Clark. “Owing to this, and the fact that all users are
notified when policies are updated, means that there is no need
to have formal ‘training’ on email. With the use of
SurfControl to monitor email content and block unsuitable messages
and Enterprise Vault [from Symantec] to archive emails for later
discovery there is no need to actively ‘monitor’ individual
activity.” Being able to store email for ‘later discovery’
however, does not prevent emails being leaked, or the consequential
damage that staff ignorance or stupidity can cause.
An electronic filing cabinet
A quick Google of Colin Clark brings up hundreds of hits, all concerning
the external email archiving system that he installed in 2001. So,
what’s the big deal? “When you get important paper documents,
you file them. When we realised we didn’t have a filing cabinet
for our emails, we went and brought one. It archives all of our
external emails and retains them. Even if a user deletes it, I’ll
still have it.”
“The Enterprise Vault has not been put in because of compliance,
although by making it part of the business, it means that compliance
is actually a by-product of the day job. You can’t force people
to comply – forced compliance is just submission, that’s
all it is. What we do is make it so that complying with corporate
statutary requirements becomes a by-product of their role, rather
than an additional task for them – then they can’t get
it wrong.”
“We negotiate thousands of promotion deals every year with
our suppliers and the system allows us to capture all relevant emails
and deal with any inconsistencies,” he adds. “In one
case we had a situation where a supplier guaranteed us they would
put £100 000 into promotional stuff over the year. They hadn’t
done it. But with the email to prove it, we got our money.”
In this very competitive market, data leakage can be incredibly
harmful. Email archiving can’t stop these emails going out,
but it can track them once they have.
“Losing promotional strategy, costs, and personal information
are the biggest headaches. We don’t monitor employees, but
if we ever have to it will be justified with a specific reason.”
“One year a member of staff thought they had sent out details
of our Christmas promotion strategy. If Co-op [a rival retailer]
found out that we were going to do Quality Street for £5,
they’d undercut us. Luckily, a quick search of the archive
and I realised that, thankfully, nothing had been leaked.”
However, retaining all external emails raises privacy issues for
staff. “The users have a personal vault which they can send
their own emails to. It’s not part of our corporate information
strategy – it’s just an additional tool for them. But
whatever happens, if it’s an external email – then I’ll
get it.”
INTERVIEW CONTINUES ON PAGE
TWO
More from July/August 2007
Tony Bradley, author of recently-published Syngress title PCI Compliance:
Understand and Implement Effective PCI Data Security Standard Compliance,
writes for Infosecurity on the
new standard
PCI: Here to stay - an
introduction to the controversial payment card security standard
Features index
|