|
4 January 2008
Doctors encourage patients to opt-out after NHS data losses
A letter for patients to use to opt-out of the English NHS’s
nascent central database of medical records, written by doctors
and medical privacy campaigners, has reached more than 200 000 downloads.
Meanwhile, nine NHS trusts have admitted data breaches, in the wake
of HM Revenue and Customs’ loss of 25 million people’s
data.
The standard
letter points out that the government is asking GPs to transfer
medical data without patients’ individual consent, against
BMA policy. “I do not believe that such a large database,
with so many staff users, can be regarded as secure,” it continues,
and quotes 93C3, a special code which records the patient’s
refusal to consent to the national shared electronic record.
Helen Wilkinson, founder of TheBigOptOut.org campaign which hosts
the letter, says interest has picked up since the HM Revenue and
Customs disaster, although the letter was first uploaded in November
2006. Following that, the Department of Health told NHS trusts to
send personal data encrypted and by courier. “In the past,
we can assume it was sent unencrypted and by normal post,”
she said.
Wilkinson added that 400 000 people working with the health service,
including staff at chemists, already have access to the existing
NHS Personal Demographic Service, which includes names and addresses
in addition to ex-directory numbers and next of kin. As the system
is not publicised, she believes this puts at risk victims of domestic
violence and others with a need for privacy. People can opt-out
only if police or social services request it.
During the Christmas holidays, nine English NHS trusts admitted
they had lost personal data on patients. The Department of Health
said it did not have figures on how many patients were affected,
but the Sunday
Mirror newspaper reported that London’s City and Hackney
primary care trust lost a CD holding the names and addresses of
160 000 children.
The other trusts reporting breaches were Bolton Royal Hospital,
Sutton and Merton, Sefton Merseyside, Mid-Essex Care Trust, Norfolk
and Norwich, Gloucester Partnership Foundation Trust, Maidstone
and Tunbridge Wells – which suffered two such incidents –
and East and North Hertfordshire.
UK'S RECENT DATA BREACHES
Big data-users could fund
stronger UK law enforcement (3 January 2008)
Government to toughen Data Protection
Act (19 December 2007)
Details of three million learner
drivers lost in Iowa (18 December 2007)
Norwich Union Life fined
£1.26m (17 December 2007)
Northern Irish drivers agency
loses data on 6000 drivers (14 December 2007)
ICO: consider privacy
before installing new IT (11 December 2007)
Banks turn monitoring
software to high (26 November 2007)
HMRC data loss: NAO request
evidence (23 November 2007)
ICO gets right to spot check
government departments in wake of HMRC privacy catastrophe (21
November 2007)
HMRC appears to be “bang
to rights” says assistant commissioner (21 November 2007)
Missing child benefit
CDs: what went wrong, and why it would have carried on regardless
(21 November 2007)
UK government loses
data on 25m Britons (20 November 2007)
News
index
|