Share

Related Links

  • Aaron's Law
  • Reed Exhibitions Ltd is not responsible for the content of external websites.

Related Stories

  • Anonymous, MIT, DoJ embroiled in aftermath of Aaron Swartz' death
    As friends and family lay to rest Reddit co-founder Aaron Swartz, who apparently took his own life on Friday amid a storm of legal accusations, the aftermath is beginning to play out.
  • Reddit co-founder dies from apparent suicide
    Aaron Swartz was found by his girlfriend Taren Stinebrickner-Kauffman hanging by his own belt in their Brooklyn apartment last Friday. On Saturday the New York medical examiner’s office ruled death by suicide.
  • Tyler – an overview, and interview with Anonymous
    Tyler is touted as ‘WikiLeaks on steroids.’ The current site (codenametyler.org) is unimpressive – so Infosecurity reached out to Anonymous for an update on its development.
  • Anonymous: We'll be back in 2013
    Many may be feeling the warm fuzzies after the end of the world failed to manifest on Dec. 21, 2012, but hacktivist collective Anonymous doesn’t want the public IT sector to get too comfortable. “Expect us in 2013” it has proclaimed, indicating that it has no intention of turning over a new leaf for the new year.
  • Jester and Anonymous agree over Westboro Baptist Church
    With a nation in mourning over last week’s Sandy Hook tragedy, the Westboro Baptist Church (WBC) has adopted its usual position: tragedies are God’s vengeance against homosexuality. It has threatened to demonstrate at the funerals – and earned the ire of both Jester and Anonymous.

Top 5 Stories

News

Anonymous launches #opAngel 2; Lofgren launches ‘Aaron’s Law’

18 January 2013

Following the death of Aaron Swartz, himself an online activist, the activist collective known as Anonymous launched #opAngel. Its purpose was to protect the Swartz funeral from disruption by followers of the Westboro Baptist Church.

In the event there was no Westboro demonstration, and Anonymous has now launched #opAngel 2 with the intent to repeal or reform of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. “Anonymous is now preparing for a longer and more extensive battle within the U.S. legal system,” it announced yesterday.

The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act is widely considered to be the cause of Swartz’ suicide. He was being vigorously prosecuted (facing up to 35 years in jail) for what many believe was little more than disobeying terms of service. “It is clear that the punishment Swartz faced was not proportional to the crimes of which he was accused,” said Anonymous yesterday. “It is our conclusion that dubious laws such as the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act serve only to provide prosecutors with the means to selectively target and unfairly punish online activists. Anonymous intends to continue Operation Angel with the goal of reforming these laws.”

Anonymous announced three immediate plans. The first is the public endorsement of Aaron’s Law, but warns that, “While the introduction of Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren’s ‘Aaron’s Law’ is a step in the right direction, it may not go far enough.”

The second is threatened cyber attacks against MIT, the DoJ, and “specifically the official websites of prosecutors in Aaron Swartz case.” Given the large and indiscriminate number of website defacements in the UK following the court rulings against Julian Assange, this is likely to spread beyond the immediate targets.

The third includes protests in the streets of Washington, D.C. – “at 600 Pennsylvania Ave (and Constitution Ave.) at 3pm EST” – and Boston (“at the John Joseph Moakley Courthouse”). “Congresswoman Lofgren is encouraged to attend the D.C. demonstration and we will provide her a platform to discuss Aaron’s Law,” says Anonymous.

Lofgren announced her proposed ‘Aaron’s Law’ on Reddit. “I’m Rep Zoe Lofgren & I’m introducing ‘Aaron’s Law’ to change the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA)”, she simply stated. Her announcement points to a Discussion Draft on a Bill with the intention “To amend title 18, United States Code, to exclude certain violations of agreements or contractual obligations, relating to Internet service, from the purview of certain criminal prohibitions, and for other purposes.”

Aaron’s Law is designed to prevent prosecution for violating terms of service conditions “if such violation constitutes the sole basis for determining that access to a protected computer is unauthorized.”

Lisa Vaas in the Sophos NakedSecurity blog, commented, “‘Aaron’s Law’ would partly de-fang Computer Fraud and Abuse Act,” but added, “the CFAA is only one of hundreds of laws in a prosecutor's toolbox.”

This article is featured in:
Compliance and Policy  •  Internet and Network Security

 

Comment on this article

You must be registered and logged in to leave a comment about this article.

We use cookies to operate this website and to improve its usability. Full details of what cookies are, why we use them and how you can manage them can be found by reading our Privacy & Cookies page. Please note that by using this site you are consenting to the use of cookies. ×