Our website uses cookies

Cookies enable us to provide the best experience possible and help us understand how visitors use our website. By browsing Infosecurity Magazine, you agree to our use of cookies.

Okay, I understand Learn more


Infosecurity welcomes op-ed pitches from industry professionals. If you would like to be considered, please send a short synopsis and proposed title for your article to Dan.Raywood@reedexpo.co.uk

The editorial team will then make a decision on whether or not to issue a commission. Please be patient, we receive several pitches every day. If your submission does get accepted, please be aware that, due to a high volume of submissions, it can take several days for articles to be published after receipt.  

Comment/op-ed Submission Guidelines:

  • Most important: The primary purpose of writing an op-ed is to draw attention to an important issue that requires action (whether this be positive acknowledgement or negative criticism). No commentary /op-ed will be accepted if it does not contain this element. It should be supplemented by the author’s clearly stated opinions on the issue.

  • Use this opportunity to address an issue that is of interest to you. The main reasons for rejection are that there is no actual argument presented - just a topic and comments on how it is resolved using one product, because they fail to present an opinion or because the writer tries to cover everything that is happening in security. Be great on one topic rather than average on multiple areas.

  • Avoid any explanatory pieces of technology, or anything going "back to basics". The Infosecurity reader is well aware of current issues so we are looking more for opinions on how to solve the problems rather than what the problem is.

  • Any submissions must be content exclusive to Infosecurity. We will not consider publishing non-exclusive op-eds. 

  • 600-800 words, search engine optimized, and with links to relevant companies/reports mentioned; also supply a 1-2 sentence summary of the article that incorporates the article key words and author’s name.

  • Use of bulleted/numbered lists is discouraged, as the point of an op-ed is to express a personal opinion. Although we do not prohibit the use of such lists, they should be used sparingly, and no more than once per op-ed. Any op-ed comprising a series of numbered/bulleted lists will be rejected.  

  • Optional: Images should accompany opinion pieces. Minimum of one image, max is 3. Images should be supplied as gif or jpeg files, and should be at least 300 pixels wide.

  • There are no deadlines for these pieces, but keep in mind that we post these articles to our site every day. So we prefer topics and content to be more evergreen in advice, and if the topic covered is very timely, we will begin an immediate review on how we can use it.

  • Opinion/comment articles should have a clear thesis, and should examine topics/subjects relevant to information security professionals. They should not be product advertisements. Product advertisement articles, or “advertorials” will not be accepted.

We are currently looking for contributors to submit an op-ed on the following topics. Updated 1st August 2018

  1. Do we need an international professional standard for security professionals?
  2. What about a standard for products, will the EU cybersecurity certification framework be a positive thing?
  3. One of the discussion points recently has been on agility and digital transformation, can this be done if security is not at the heart of the company?
  4. We have talked endlessly about the death of passwords, will WebAuthn be adopted to enable ubiquitous authentication?

If you are interested in writing on any of these topics, please email Dan.Raywood@reedexpo.co.uk

What’s Hot on Infosecurity Magazine?