According to Stuart Paton, senior solutions architect with Cloudmark, the internet is moving swiftly to adopt a new technology for the underlying networking used to track nodes on the network and communicate.
Because of this, he argues that the introduction of the IPv6 scheme could have a far reaching impact on spam security.
"As an example, the primary method for stopping the majority of spam used by email providers is to track bad IP addresses sending email and block them - a process known as IP Blacklisting", he said.
"With IPv6 this technique will no longer be possible and could mean that email systems would quickly become overloaded if new approaches are not developed to address this. This is one example, but there are other examples across the web", he added.
Paton went on to say that IPv6 has been designed to have a significantly larger number of available IP addresses than IPv4.
"Fundamentally, this presents serious difficulties in tracking all of the IPs for any purpose-email sender reputation, denial of service, sources used for malicious sign ups to websites, sources of click fraud attacks, influencing of search engine results, and many other scenarios", he explained.
Paton cites the example of the IPv6 address space being so large that it would be easy for spammers to use a single IP address just once to send a single email.
Based on these new risks with IPv6, he says that Cloudmark advocates that ISPs do not initially need to be able to receive mail from IPv6 addresses except from their own customers.
This would, he adds, ensure business continuity for ISPs and provisioning of ADSL/Cable modems to continue.
"This measure will also protect the IPv4 reputation system that is currently in use and working well", he noted.
14 March 2011
While IPv6 certainly adds a great deal of address space, suggesting IP reputation will be impossible with it is absolutely not true. For more information, see here:
Note: The majority of comments posted are created by members of the
public. The views expressed are theirs and unless specifically stated are not those
Elsevier Ltd. We are not responsible for any content posted by members of the public
or content of any third party sites that are accessible through this site. Any links
to third party websites from this website do not amount to any endorsement of that
site by the Elsevier Ltd and any use of that site by you is at your own risk. For
further information, please refer to our Terms & Conditions.
Comment on this article
You must be registered and logged in to leave a comment
about this article.