Related Stories

  • What level of authentication is needed?
    Usability and context are often more important than the absolute effectiveness of authentication. It's why the simple password refuses to die, reports William Knight.
  • Comment: How to stay mobile whilst keeping sensitive data safe
    Press coverage is, on the whole, to be welcomed; however negative publicity hurts your brand and image and does not help win hearts, minds and new customers. So why do so many companies actively court this by being so poor when it comes to handling sensitive data?
  • Keeping sensitive information secure when staff is leaving
    Career loyalty is an endangered creature. Unlike our predecessors, today’s workforce is unlikely to stay committed to a job for five years, let alone their entire lives. But with such a fluid stream of employees keeping human resources busy, and countless eyes being cast over company data, Rob Stringer investigates how sensitive information can stay faithful to its organisation, even if its staff don’t...
  • Someone’s got to pay
    Consumers are increasingly trading the high street for the home computer, and in both cases getting more than they bargained for. Rob Stringer investigates the fraud and fuzzy legislation of retail security
  • Majority break information security policies – survey
    The majority of employees admit to serious non-compliant workplace behaviour when it comes to information security, according to a study from the Ponemon Institute and sponsored by Californian secure flash drive provider IronKey.

News

Mobiles put four out of five commuters at risk of ID theft

19 March 2009

A survey of commuters by data protection company, Credant Technologies, has reported that 80% of mobile phone users store information on their devices that could be used to steal their identities.

Six hundred commuters were interrogated at London railway stations about their mobile phone usage and storage habits. Sixteen per cent admitted to saving bank account details onto their mobile phones, while 24% used them to keep a note of their pin numbers and passwords.

Eleven percent of those interviewed kept their social security and inland revenue details on their phones, while 10% used them to store credit card information.

Of all the commuters questioned, 40% did not protect their devices with a password.

Credant also found that 99% of the commuters surveyed used their phones for business, despite 26% being specifically instructed by their employers not to do so. Seventy seven percent kept business names and addresses on their phone, while 23% use them to store customer information.

Paul Huntingdon, public sector director at Credant Technologies and adviser to many Government departments cautioned that “Once you have access to someone’s emails, passwords, birthdays, business diary, documents, children’s names and pets you can easily masquerade as that person, sending out emails under their name, read all their corporate data and get to see every personal detail of their life.”

Huntingdon goes on to warn that “People are ignorant to how easy a professional thief could take over their life and effectively destroy it. It is therefore imperative that all mobile phone users, even with the most basic handset, password protect and encrypt them.”

 

This article is featured in:
Identity and Access Management Wireless and Mobile Security

 

Comment on this article

You must be registered and logged in to leave a comment about this article.